  It's a good thing that
political coverage has come a long way from its primitive origins in
the early days of our Republic
And
they're off . . . way off!RACE TO
WHITE HOUSE TAKES AN EARLY LEAD
By
A.J. Liebling Press
Correspondent
It starts earlier every year – with the
election a mere 20 months away, the Race to the White House is already
dominating the news. While
the nation is focused on the continuing slaughter of young American in
Iraq, lack of affordable health care, economic uncertainty and stagnant
income growth, the media has wasted barrels of ink and hours of uplink
time on the pointless question of who might be "leading" 11 months
before the first voters
cast ballots. "I can't believe
the news media has already hit the hustings, dogging every Manny, Moe
and Hillary as they make their way through the frozen wastes of New
Hampshire," commented one veteran hack from his vantage point at the
National Press Club bar. "Usually
the press speculation about who's ahead and who's behind doesn't really
pick up until the autumn before the election year, but this year,
they're already out in force." Indeed,
statisticians at the Spy
have carefully polled the number of column inches and news minutes
devoted to the Race to the White House. They have reported
that who's ahead-who's behind "horserace" stories lead all other
political coverage
by a margin of better than 2 to 1. The
solid lead enjoyed by Race to the White House stories was due to an
enormous outpouring of tedious recounting of which consultants had
signed up with which candidates, fascinating tales of candidates
journeying to places where rich sympathizers might shower money on
them, Republicans pandering to their base of Holy Rolling
snake-handlers and the usual meaningless polls, straw and otherwise. This year, however, the lead enjoyed by Race to
the White House stories was lengthened by amusing accounts of internal
campaign memos stolen and leaked to the press and insufferable sound
bites from fat cats switching allegiances from one candidate to another. Coming in a distant second to Race to
the White House coverage are stories about a
candidate's physical appearance. Wilfred Romney's jutting
chin, Hillary Clinton's inevitable pantsuits and Barrack Obama in swim
trunks have all contributed to the second-place showing for irrelevant
prattling about the physical attributes of candidates and the supposed
effect of their appearance on their electability. "The strong second-place showing of physical
appearance stories is all the more remarkable given that the public
doesn't seem to give a hoot. After all, the current
incumbent looks like Alfred E. Newman after a twenty-year crack
bender,"
commented media expert Phillip D. Story [A.J.'s not making up quotes
again, is he? – Copy Ed.] The
only bright spot, Prof. Story noted, was that appearance stories have
declined by 10 percentage points since 2000, when 45% of all campaign
coverage emphasized
Al Gore's supposed woodenness and his mythical decision to adopt
clothing in "earth tones." Another
potentially promising development has been the decline in false
political smears parroted by gullible, lazy or biased journalists.
At the height of the 2004 campaign, such smears led all other
political coverage by 12 percentage points, declining to 4 percentage
points when Schlox News was removed from the sample. With Race to the White House stories holding a
commanding lead in political coverage, the remaining topics are forced
to compete for leftovers, such as Saturday afternoons on MSNBC and
Monday newspapers. These also-rans include the brutal war in
Iraq, the war against terrorism we are losing in Afghanistan, the
impending catastrophe of global warming, the 47 million Americans
without health insurance, and the surging inequality of incomes and
life outcomes exacerbated by the Bush Administration's pro-rich tax and
economic policies. "Nobody
gives a crap about that stuff," said the Spy's own in house
political editor David Bloviator. An
anonymous network anchor who asked to be referred to only as "America's
Sweetheart" echoed Bloviator. "That stuff is much too
downbeat for the evening news. If I covered boring issues,
how could I find time for tonight's package on candidates vying for the
support of Brad and Angelina?" she asked, before adding with
her trademark pixieish grin: "Now
get out of my sight." All the
pundits agreed that Race to the White House stories are likely to
maintain their lead between now and Election Day. Explained
one cable news producer: "We have to cover who's winning and
who's losing. It's our version of American
Idol."
|