| Volume CCXXXVIII, Number 195 February 10, 2008 |
|
Editors' Note: The drama of Super Tuesday and the super flameouts of Wilfred M. Romney and Rudolph Giuliani have left us in desperate need of a dose of political sagacity from The Best Political One-Man Team in the History of American Journalism® (suck on that, MSNBC!): the Spy's own David Bloviator. We were granted an audience with the Great One, perched as usual at the Best Place in America to cover the campaigns: the National Press Club bar in Washington. David Bloviator – The Best Political One-Man Team in the History of American Journalism®: Maverick feasting on Democratic disarray TMS: Tell us, Mr. Bloviator, how would you characterize the current status of the Presidential election? The
Best Political One-Man Team in the History of American Journalism®
recently shared his unparalleled wisdom with you, the humble reader.
DB: It's been a ride. More specifically, it's been a roller coaster ride. Lots of ups and downs, some sickening curves and lots of screaming. TMS: It's certainly been a bad year for the pundits. For example, on Nov. 1 of last year, you wrote: "With media-savvy Fred Thompson in the race, the Republican field has been narrowed to a contest between Thompson and America's Mayor, Rudy Giuliani." What happened? DB: That was eons ago. The whole political climate has been turned. TMS: Turned? How so? DB: Upside down, man, upside down. Speaking of which, I've turned this glass upside down and there's no Scotch coming out of it. Get me another double like a good lad. TMS: So were you surprised when John McCain emerged as the clear front-runner. DB: Of course not. Pundits are never surprised. Circumstances change. TMS: What changed since you wrote in early January, "Despite an early setback in Iowa, with $50 million to spend, a handsome, chiseled countenance and a firm conservative message, Mitt Romney has to be considered the man to beat?" DB: He spent the $50 million. TMS: And got shellacked. DB: He had difficulty communicating his message. TMS: What was his message anyway? DB: I
should be
President. TMS: That seems reasonably clear. What effect did it have on the electorate? DB: It did not stir the electorate. TMS: Did they rally to his cause? DB: They did not. [For an alternative explanation, see box at right – Ed.] Why Romney lost: you read it first in the Spy "Wilfred M. Romney earned his [2007 Douchebag of the Year] award not just by his remarkable ability to change his values and his principles to suit the fancy of the electorate to which he was pandering at any given time. It was his transcending moments of douchebaggery that attracted our judges . . ." – The Massachusetts Spy, Jan. 1, 2008. ""What happened to the Romney campaign?" Jon Stewart asked correspondent Jason Jones. "He was well-funded, and he certainly looked the part," answered Jones, "but I don't think the Romney camp ever recovered from the fact that Mitt Romney is a douchebag."" – The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, Feb. 7, 2008. TMS: Let's talk about John McCain. How would you describe the Senator from Arizona? DB: He is a maverick, a war hero and a clear break from the last eight years of the Bush Administration. TMS: He agrees with Bush on prolonging the Iraq War forever, tax cuts for the rich, eliminating a woman's right to choose an abortion and cutting the social safety net into ribbons. What makes him such a clear break? DB: He is a man of principle. He does not sway with the political winds. TMS: Then why did he oppose tax cuts for the rich in 2001 but support them to win support from Republican wingnuts in the primary? DB: He's a pragmatist. A principled pragmatist. And not only that, but on his plane, he calls me the "Dave-meister." And his wife – did you see her after the Florida primary? She's built like a brick – TMS: Maybe we'd better move on to the Democratic race. How would you describe it? DB: A horse race. A dead heat. A battle to the wire. TMS: Does this close race threaten? DB: It does indeed. TMS: What does it threaten? DB: It threatens a brokered convention. It threatens the kind of disharmony and discord that have plagued the Democrats for years. TMS: What about Republican discord, when you have influential conservative transsexuals like Ann Coulter vowing to vote for Hillary before she votes for McCain? DB: The Republicans will unite behind their candidate. TMS: Despite the threats of their blabbering talk show hosts? DB: The Republicans will be united by their hatred. TMS: Hatred of what? DB: Hatred of Hillary. TMS: What if Obama is the nominee? DB: The Republicans will be united by their hatred. TMS: Of Obama? DB: Among other things. TMS: Turning to the Democrats, are you willing to predict who will be the nominee? DB: It requires a look. TMS: A look at what? DB: A look at the old crystal ball, you nitwit. TMS: Looking into your crystal ball, what do you see? DB: Ask again later. TMS: Are you looking into your crystal ball or your magic 8-ball? DB: Look at the time. I have to get to a cocktail party, I mean, press conference at John and Cindy's. TMS: Thank you, Mr. Bloviator. |
|
SO DID OUR TOOL SHED, BUT WE DON'T GET MANY TOURISTS The dinner hour at Turandot brings further proof that the Russian taste for Old World opulence didn't perish with the Romanovs. Led by hostesses in 18th-Century style silk gowns, businessmen in suits and deep-pocketed couples make their way across the grand marble courtyard and into a domed and colonnaded dining room that looks airlifted from Versailles. Adding to the ambiance, a harpist and harpsichordist conjure classical melodies, which mingle with the delicate clatter of Arthur Price silverware on Bauscher porcelain. Opened last year, Turandot took six years and $50 to build . . . . – The New York Times, Dec. 9, 2007, Travel Sec. at 9. |