
Bruce
Wasserstein: deal hustler and tout
 Bruce
Wasserstein unleashed a flood of Wasserstein's Monsters on corporate
America. Only one guy profited from the resulting carnage.
By
U. Netanya Tokef Obituary Writer
It
took 61 years for Bruce Wasserstein to find someone whose pocket he
couldn't pick, but on October 14, 2009 the Grim Reaper completed his
hostile takeover of the once-high flying financier. The
traditional form of closing announcement is planned: a tombstone. It's
hard to think of any other non-criminal pillar of American capitalism
who had such a transformative effect on business without accomplishing
anything of lasting value. Henry Ford built cars. Bill
Gates brought the PC, albeit buggy, crash-prone, and virus-ridden, into
everyone's life. Even the Waltons brought low-priced crap to
the
impoverished masses of the hinterlands. What did Bruce
Wasserstein do to earn the better part of a billion dollars? Answering
that question requires looking back about 30 years or so, a task beyond
the ability of our current news media, who briefly fawned over the
departed mogul until they realized he was no longer in a
position
to do anything for them. It's
hard for the current
greedy generation of Ivy League undergraduates to realize that in the
'60's and '70's, the vaunted phrase "investment banking" never passed
the lips of their parents. Wall Street was regarded a safe,
dull
place where dummies and jocks could earn enough for a Park Avenue co-op
and a second wife, but hardly the sums that every 29-year-old
"i-banker" now regards as his or her God-given right. That's
why "Mad Men" is set in advertising, not in the grim granite towers of
lower Manhattan that then held such departed colossi as First Boston,
Salomon Brothers, or Kidder Peabody. The old Wall Street
firms
spent their days collecting fixed commissions, dispensing supposedly
sage advice to corporate boards, and reviling the intelligence, skills,
grooming, and dress of their counterparts in firms of a different
ethnic cast (or caste). It was all very jolly and pretty much
under the radar. Enter Bruce
Wasserstein (and a couple of his compatriots who are still walking
around in
apparent good health). Wasserstein grasped that his
contemporary
world had plenty of three important commodities: (a) capital, (b)
commercial banks unable to price risk properly, and
(3) stable,
if not stolid, public companies that commanded little attention or
respect from Wall Street analysts. With those three elements,
Bruce understood it was pretty much possible for anyone to buy
anything. If the deal worked, Bruce got a huge fee.
If the
deal cratered a year later, Bruce still got his huge fee, plus the
chance to resell the wreckage to someone else. All
he needed were some swashbucklers who were willing to risk billions of
other people's money overpaying for dismal assets. Soon
enough, a
series of Wasserstein's Monsters lumbered into Manhattan, the more
obscure, the better. Wasserstein made it possible for
heretofore
unknown Ottawa landlords and finaglers from the Australian outback to
engulf and devour great retailing and industrial firms. Of
course, these creatures had no clue how to operate these businesses so
as to make money or even generate enough cash to service the monumental
debt that Bruce told them to take on. If you've been to
Bonwit
Teller or Jordan Marsh lately, you'll know what we mean. You read it
first in the Spy
KABUL, Afghanistan – In a shocking development sure to have
grave implications for the future of democracy and the U.S. war effort
in Afghanistan, the Afghan Supreme Court ruled yesterday by a five to
four vote to certify the re-election of President . . .
Karzai.
The unexpected decision has the
effect of stopping the planned runoff election dead in its tracks.
According to Afghani constitutional law and goat skinning specialists,
in that primitive land, decisions of the Afghani Supreme Court are
final, nonreviewable, and not subject to modification by ordinary
democratic processes. –
The Massachusetts Spy, October 25, 2009. On
Monday a spokesman for the Independent Election Commission (IEC),
Azizullah Lodin, declared that President Karzai, "the only candidate
for the second round", had been "elected president of Afghanistan".
He
said the second round on 7 November was being scrapped to save money,
for security reasons and to prevent further setbacks that could damage
Afghanistan politically and economically. –
BBC.com, November 2, 2009.
As
for the little people who beavered away for modest salaries at these
soon-to-disappear institutions, well, they could read up on their
Schumpeter in the unemployment lines. Wasserstein was off to
his
next deal. Like Wehrner von Braun, once the rockets went up,
he
didn't care where they came down. That wasn't his department. But
the most fun was yet to come, if only because Wasserstein's next
generation of victims generated no sympathy from anyone.
Having noticed that the real money in deal touting was not
the fee for getting it to the finish line before it drowned in its own
debt but in owning the tout shop, Wasserstein and some of his buddies
set up their own "boutique."
It
didn't take long for one of the brain-dead banks that kept lending into
these crappy deals to offer to buy Wasserstein's outfit for the bargain
price of $1,370,000,000. Having trousered the swag, Bruce
stuck around long enough to fulfill the terms of his employment
agreement – a year – and then headed for
the hills, leaving the poor dumb Krauts
with nothing but his name on the door. In dealmaking, such an
asset is known as "goodwill." But
like the producers of the "Saw" movies or Kim Kardashian, he
was able to draw from the same well again and again, capping his career
with a more or less hostile takeover of the firm once known as Lazard
Freres. Hey, no one ever forced anyone to buy what Bruce was
selling. Later in life, perhaps
realizing the utter pointlessness of his chosen profession, he dabbled
in real businesses like magazine publishing and dropped $25 million on
the charity that tugs at all of our heartstrings: Harvard Law
School. Toss in a few wives, and that's pretty much that. The reader may protest that we're being a
little tough on the late titan of Wall Street, who after all isn't
around to defend himself, or even pay someone else to do so.
But
we think that, wherever he is, Bruce might be smiling because we're
only following
in his footsteps: we're pounding away on some poor bastard who, through
no fault of his own, isn't able to fight back. Of course, Bruce would wonder what kind of a
schmuck would do it for free. |